Partnership & Accountability blog series

Partnership & Accountability blog series

Accountability to the women´s and to social justice movements is crucial for building collaborative and equitable partnerships. Accountability requires the development of a receptive capacity in men and others who have been placed in positions of power and privilege, so that they can listen to the perspectives and needs of oppressed groups in order to become authentic allies. Accountability and partnership building also require us to engage in respectful dialogues, and a willingness to constantly address issues and concerns raised by our partners.

We hope that this blog series contributes to these ongoing conversations and serves as another platform to share useful information.

Blog posts are written by member and partners of MenEngage, for whom we provide a platform for dialogue. The opinions expressed in the posts do not necessarily represent those of the MenEngage Alliance.

To learn more about MenEngage & Accountability go to www.menengage.org/accountability

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

MenEngage Alliance & NAMEN's Joint Response to accusations of harassment, misconduct and bullying by men within the field of engaging men and boys in gender equality


It is with grave concern that we address two distinct cases of allegations of harassment, misconduct and bullying by two men, Michael Kimmel, Professor of Sociology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, and Ravi Karkara, Senior Advisor at UN Women, who are considered longstanding leaders in the field of engaging men and boys in gender equality.

We acknowledge that the investigation into these cases is still in progress. However, while we await the outcomes of formal investigation processes, we believe silence and inaction is not an option. MenEngage Alliance takes a survivor-centered approach to such cases, which involves listening to and supporting survivors. We do not need to wait until someone has been formally charged or proven guilty in order to offer those who have come forward empathy and ally-ship. 

While the specific allegations of these cases differ significantly, we agree that these cases share key underlying factors that have become all too familiar. Namely, men in positions of power are alleged to have used and abused their influence to manipulate, coerce, bully and systematically subordinate others - which includes deeply troubling reports of sexual harassment and misconduct. The nature of these allegations is all the more concerning because the two men who are implicated have been widely regarded as leading advocates and mentors to others in our field for many years. Their work includes collaborations with - and participation in - MenEngage Alliance activities[1]. This response is therefore not only a call on those implicated but on the institutions they belong to – including our own.

As a network founded on human rights and feminist principles, MenEngage Alliance upholds its core principles and code of conduct and holds everyone affiliated with the Alliance, including our staff, network members and collaborating partners, to account by these standards. These include zero tolerance against violence; the prioritization of transparency and ethical standards; maximizing safety and wellbeing for all; and holding one another accountable. These accusations represent a crucial test for us as an Alliance and the men and masculinities field in upholding these principles we have set for ourselves. 

MenEngage Alliance stands with those who have bravely come forward, including those that have remained anonymous, and acknowledge the courage it has taken them to speak openly about their experiences. Some of the suggested ways forward outlined in this response come from those affected by the cases, and we take responsibility through the platforms we have, to elevate their voices, from a Do No Harm principle. 

This type of abuse is often able to happen and persist for such long periods of time, because of underlying power dynamics, and the significant influence some men hold in their institutions, over their peers, coupled with a deep sense of (male) entitlement that overrides even the knowledge of what constitutes respectful and equitable relationships. 

While we await the formal outcomes of the investigative processes, we call on those involved to take the following actions: 

The accused

  • We call on the accused men to listen to and acknowledge the experiences of the accusers, to respond and acknowledge their behaviors through transparent representation of the events, and, if the investigations into these cases find the accusations to be true, to take full responsibility for their actions. 
  • If those who have been harmed wish to seek restorative justice, we urge those accused to make amends and provide support in this process as appropriate.
  • We also urge other men who are close to those accused to encourage and support them to remain accountable according to their professed pro-feminist values and commitments.

Individual men and the men and masculinities field

  • We call on men, as a privileged constituency, to speak up and act when such cases of abuse and violence occur. It is expected of those men who consider themselves pro-feminist, to speak out and hold other men to account for any harmful acts.
  • We emphasize that any such reflections and actions by and among men need to be done alongside the invaluable reflections and calls to action of women’s rights, gender equality and feminist activists.
  • This moment calls for serious introspection and action among men working in the gender equality field, on how our systems of accountability have failed, and ask ourselves what prevented us from realizing or acknowledging abuse was occurring in our field, and what prevented those who knew from speaking out.
  • We call on MenEngage Alliance members and partners, as well as all men and boys who are part of the movements towards women’s rights and gender justice, to strengthen our own systems of relational accountability and restorative justice. We must foster a space to support and challenge each other so that we can truly embody the core principles that we have set for ourselves and to hold each other to account.

The institutions involved

  • We call on these institutions to assess their organizational practices in order to contribute to the prevention of future cases of harassment, misconduct, and bullying - including sexual- and to ensure they have proper systems and capacity to handle any future incidents in an adequate manner, assuring that due process for accuser and accused is institutionalized and strictly adhered to.
  • We urge these institutions in their response to build on the expertise of feminist women’s rights organizations on survivor-centered approaches to handling such cases.
  • We remind these institutions that simply having policies and mechanisms is not enough, they must be used regularly and as part of wider efforts to transform institutional cultures, end impunity for perpetrators, and create safer workplace environments. This includes an examination of institutional structures and hierarchies, and patriarchal power dynamics which allow sexual misconduct and bullying to occur and prevent it from being reported.
  • We commit to monitoring these cases closely to support accountable processes by State University of New York at Stony Brook and UN Women, in which the cases are handled adequately and appropriately, the necessary support is given to survivors and justice is delivered in a timely manner.

MenEngage Alliance

  • As an Alliance, we must and will take this challenging moment to come together to strengthen our collective and individual accountable practices and amplify our efforts to eliminate all forms of violence and impunity, and dismantle patriarchy.
  • We commit to continuing the process MenEngage Alliance has been undertaking in recent months, to develop comprehensive internal policies and mechanisms on preventing and responding to all types of violence and abuse – the importance and urgency of which is further underlined by these recent cases. We have come to the realization that despite one of our core principles being ‘zero tolerance against any form of sexual harassment, abuse and exploitation’, we need to strengthen internal policies and lay out proper standards, response and handling mechanisms to effectively prevent and respond to any cases should they occur.
  • We urge all our members and organizations to conduct regular gender assessments and capacity development efforts, informed by feminist principles and expertise. The Alliance’s Accountability Toolkit can be a useful resource to carry out an inclusive, participatory reflection and develop and monitor action points with your colleagues on your organization or network’s institutional practices and culture.

MenEngage Alliance is willing to be of utmost support, within the limits of its expertise and capacity, to those who have been affected by these situations. We can offer a safe space for conversation and sharing, and jointly explore available support from other expert organizations or individuals based on specific needs. You can reach out to us here.

Abhijit Das, Co-Chair, MenEngage Alliance / Director, Center for Health and Social Justice, India
Humberto Carolo, Co-Chair, MenEngage Alliance / Executive Director, White Ribbon Canada
Craig Norberg-Bohm, Co-Chair, North American MenEngage Network (NAMEN)
Joni van de Sand, Director, MenEngage Alliance Global Secretairat

===============================================================

The original reporting on these cases:


Further references and resources:



[1] MenEngage Alliance has collaborated with Michael Kimmel and Stony Brook University in organizing various conferences and events, and he has contributed to MenEngage Alliance publications. He has since many years been considered a thought leader and mentor to many in this field of work. Ravi Karkara has been involved within MenEngage Alliance since its early days while he was working with various NGOs. As staff of UN Women, he worked on strategies to engage men and boys, and MenEngage Alliance collaborated with him in various UN events, including around youth participation.


Friday, February 9, 2018

#MentorHer is a Feeble effort at Redemption

By Abhijit Das*

The global #MeToo campaign and movement by women, which called out the sexual harassment that women have to face in the workplace has now come up with a response #MentorHer. This campaign was launched on the 6th of February through the website LeanIn.org. The campaign has been informed by a survey among nearly 3000 men and women in the US and aims to “get more men to mentor women in the workplace”. #MentorHer has been launched to mitigate the potential backlash against women in the workplace, especially in the corporate sector. It acknowledges that now managers ‘feel uncomfortable working with a woman’. It assumes that once mentored more women will lead and when women lead the workplace will be ‘stronger and safer for everyone'. Thirty eight CEO’s have committed to mentoring women in the workplace. Mentoring is recognized as a powerful learning and grooming tool for leaders. It is a form of inter-generational learning, a tool for passing skills and values between trusted associates. It is also volitional, or mutual, where the best mentorship takes place only when the mentor and mentored both agree.

On the face of it #MentorHer appears to be a good strategy to develop women’s leadership in the workplace, i.e. in different industries and sectors. It would appear to be a good strategy to move women from the shop floor to the supervisor’s role, from the receptionist to the executive, and from the middle management to the upper management. If well executed it may well be the strategy that will allow women to break the glass ceiling in such a manner that it becomes part of history, and more women occupy the boardroom as well as the cabinet.

Women’s secondary situation in the workplace is a well-known problem, but the problem that #MeToo raised is related to the sexual harassment that women face while working. This could be an overtly sexist environment among peers to a more frank request for sexual favours by the superior. #MentorHer ignores this sexual harassment of women by men and does not address the issue of subordination and objectification of women. If it is being endorsed by CEOs, it means that the CEOs in question are making no call to review their attitudes towards their female colleagues and associates. This is where the problem #MeToo indicated lies, not in women’s lack of leadership abilities.

The mentorship proposition starts with a gendered assumption that the manager is a man who now feels uncomfortable because the subordinate woman will no longer be ‘quiet’ but has been ‘empowered’ and will call out his harassment. So some level of empowerment is being assumed and while additional mentorship may put women in more leadership positions, they will continue to remain prey to higher level male leaders who don’t mind making jokes about ‘grabbing pussy’. So the success of #MentorHer doesn’t address the key issue, just proposes to defer it to a higher level because as long as a ‘pussy grabbing’ kind of disrespectful attitude persists among men the problem remains.

With all due respect to the organisers of this effort I personally feel that #MentorHer falls short as a response to #MeToo. It continues to see women as being responsible for their own safety. If it is indeed supported and sponsored by male leaders of industry, I feel these leaders have failed to take any accountability for the failure of men in positions of authority and power to abuse this privilege in sexually abusing women subordinates. A simpler call like #IRespect would have been more direct and meaningful.

*Dr. Abhijit Das is the Director of Center for Health and Social Justice (CHSJ), India and Co-Chair of MenEngage Alliance.